from Daddy Dragon:

Update: BREXIT Court Case refusal of Judicial Review

VIDEO:

European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 2017 CHAPTER 9 An Act to confer power on the Prime Minister to notify, under Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union, the United Kingdom’s intention to withdraw from the EU. [16th March 2017] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Power to notify withdrawal from the EU (1) The Prime Minister may notify, under Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union, the United Kingdom’s intention to withdraw from the EU. (2) This section has effect despite any provision made by or under the European Communities Act 1972 or [any other enactment]. 2 Short title This Act may be cited as the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. People I really need your help on this by getting this into the face of every news outlet. Robin Tilbrook’s Facebook account was taken down (disabled) when he published the full 137 words of this law! (In text form as above ) i.e They do not want the text version and nub of the case – This Law – all over the internet! European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. Why is it significant? The presiding Judge in our case omitted this from his ruling in its entirety! In my view he did this on purpose to mislead people into thinking our case was in his words “The nub of the claim” other acts, without referring to the “real” nub of the claim “European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017” This is NOT a minor omission. There is a reason for it! We are right! He could not disagree and therefore chose not to rule on it or mention it! HE CHOSE TO REFUSE OUR JUDICIAL REVIEW TO STOP THIS BEING AIRED IN OPEN COURT. The same as MSM and Parliament! A pattern is emerging! The picture is like a Meme. It cannot be censored. The text can. It is the text they are worried about! This act is so “specific” in it’s wording in LAW (it does not imply, it is specific). There is NOTHING complex about this at all. 1. It only confers power by parliament to issue the notice (not withdraw or extend it). 2. Once notice is given the clocks ticking (two years max OUT, OUT) 3. It specifically repeals (in spite of) the European Communities Act 1972. 4. “any other enactment” The last limb of this simple Law says “no other law,” which means no statutory instrument, no motion, no other law! can alter this act. The act has full force of “Constitutional Law” as it was elevated and caused by three things 1. A Common Law ruling in the Gina Miller case 2. Common Law ruling in the Metric Martyrs Case 3. The 2nd Referendum. Thats it. No if’s No But’s. Your BEING CONNED like in the 1970’s by the same establishment, same play book, Different actors! Look at the ruling from this Judge. Not a single mention of “European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. This simple 137 word law. Not a single ref. It mentions all of the other acts except this “crucial one”. This is deliberate! Why? We are OUT!

FUNDING Graham Moore www.paypal.me/SaveEngland as a content provider! Support a truth teller who got fired again or help me get another job: twitter @grahamHmoore