9/11

The Brussels AE911Truth Press Conference (no Q&A): Gage/Honegger 5-14-18

By  |  1 Comment

from AE911Truth:

Loading...

The Brussels AE911Truth Press Conference (no Q&A): Gage/Honegger 5-14-18

VIDEO:

AE911Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA,, along with LC 911 Inquiry Board member Barbara Honegger gave a press conference in Brussels, Belgium on 5/14/18 as part of the 4-city Europe Tour “9/11 Justice: Every Nation, Every Citizen”.

The opening remarks addressed the need for this call from America to Europe for help – why we are here in Brussels at 9/11. 9/11 was the first and only time that Article 5 of the Mutual Defense Treaty, the Authorization of Utilized Military Force (UAM) was invoked, and it was done, as even the steel of the 9/11 and Article 5 Memorial would testify, on provable lies.

Gage provides an overview of the explosive destruction of the 3 WTC skyscrapers on 9/11. The closing remarks addressed legal options for Americans and Europeans alike which include actions such as the Grand Jury Petition in America noted above.

For more information: visit http://AE911Truth.org and http://WTC7Evaluation.org

1 Comment

  1. Thomas Potter

    May 28, 2018 at 8:09 am

    If Mr. Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive his supporters and the American people by claiming to present the best “scientific forensic evidence”, only to completely ignore the large sum of scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a scientist or researcher only presented the evidence that supports their hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered their hypothesis, they could be stripped of their professional license or degree for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration.

    Theory, speculation, and belief are not necessary to understand that a type of directed energy was used on 9/11, rather, only a detailed study of the empirical evidence from 9/11 is necessary. This also helps to illustrate a major difference between Dr. Judy Wood and other 9/11 self proclaimed researchers, as she did not start with theory or speculation and then begin researching to see if it was consistent with the evidence. Instead, Dr. Wood simply did what any objective, vigilant scientist would do, she gathered and studied as much of the empirical evidence from 9/11 as possible, assembling a monumental database of verifiable physical evidence that dwarfs the efforts of any other 9/11 “research”, including the unscientific ‘9/11 Commission Report’. After gathering and studying all of this important evidence, Dr. Wood arrived at the only logical, inescapable conclusion that explains all of this empirical evidence, a general category of weapon technology known as ‘directed energy weapons’ (DEW). It would be theory or speculation to go beyond that by trying to name a specific weapon technology or location, because that is not what the evidence allows us to irrefutably conclude. This is why the term is left as a general one, because that is the only logical, conclusive, and irrefutable conclusion that the evidence allows us to make.

    This download is the Foreword and book review of “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” by Eric Larsen, Professor Emeritus at John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1971 – 2006 (35 years), plus the Author’s Preface.

    http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Where%20Did%20The%20Towers%20Go%20-%20Dr%20Judy%20Wood.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar