Jesus: Is this an honest account of Jesus or are we being fooled again?

by Katherine Frisk, The Phaser.com:

According to a newly found document we now have a contemporary eyewitness account of “Jesus.”

The problem with the Vatican is that they have lied so much over the years that nobody wants to believe them anymore.

On the other hand , this story does interest me on two levels.

The first was a “miracle”performed in front of an ignorant and uneducated crowd. We have stories every day of still births and were doctors regularly bring these children to life.

An emotionally charged and ignorant crowd could quite easily see this as a “miracle. ”

The second thing that interests me is the location of this story. Sebaste, near Nabulus on the West bank. Which was a Samaritan stronghold and still is today.

What is more, in line with Islamic thinking, Jesus is referred to as a prophet and a teacher who came from Nazareth. Such a person called Jesus, a derivative of the Hebrew name Joshua, whose father was called Joseph, supports my theory that our Jesus was not from the tribe of Judah or a “son of David,” but was instead from the tribe of Ephraim, the son of Joseph who was blessed by Jacob /Israel as the firstborn and whose grandson Joshua, established Israel in the promised land. (see Jeremiah 31)

As a descendant of Joseph and in turn Joshua, Jesus would never have embraced the concept of Monarchy, which is further expounded on in 1 Samuel 8.

This has very marked political implications. Not only in the first century A.D., but also in the 21st Century.

When Jesus was tempted in the desert with all the Kingdoms of the world, he turned him down.

When the people tried to make him a king, he left for the hills.

When Pilate posed the question to him of being a “King of the Jews,” he quite simply said, “The words are yours.”

In the New Testament, the accusation against him for calling himself a “King of the Jews” was in fact false. It was a travesty of justice both on the part of the Jewish Sanhedrin and Rome. Both are complicit.

The interpolation of a Judaic, Monarchical, Davidic ancestry, as given in some New Testament texts, supports not only Zionism today and a Messiah from the tribe of Judah who will rule the world, but the Roman Catholic self declared decree, that the Pope owns the planet, all bodies on it and all souls. Thus supporting Empire under Rome, as well as Zionism, with central control under a single authority which is contrary not only to Israel and the Hebrew heritage but to Christianity as well.

In the Gospel of John we find the antithesis where “Jesus”constantly says, “The Jews say but I tell you,” which implies a Joshua/Ephraim/Joseph philosophy as blessed by Israel/Jacob, as opposed to a Judaic form of Monarchy over all 12 tribes.

What we are looking at is dictatorship in opposition to Federation and a Republic as Moses and Joshua intended it to be.

The Jesuit Oath has a marked resemblance to the to the Protocols of Zion, which suggests that the latter was plagiarised from the former having been written first. In both accounts anyone deviating from their particular philosophy can and should be killed like cattle in the slaughter house. 2,000 years later Rome and the Sanhedrin under the Sadducees are still joined at the hip.

I sincerely hope that one day this issue will be resolved. Western societies have been brainwashed with what appears to me to be a false philosophy. That of Monarchy, Temple and High Priest setting aside the original intentions not only of Moses and Joshua, but of Jesus himself.

Here is the article:

Newly Found Document Holds Eyewitness Account of Jesus Performing Miracle